Why reactive periodic work costs more
Work bought reactively is bought at a disadvantage. The area has usually deteriorated past the point where routine treatment restores it, so a heavier and more expensive method is needed. The timing is dictated by whoever noticed, which is rarely the quietest week available. And because it is unplanned, it competes with whatever else the budget was holding, which is how a carpet clean ends up displacing something that mattered more.
Planned periodic work avoids all three problems. Treating carpet before it holds visible soil is faster and produces a better result than restoring it afterwards. Scheduling floor work into a known quiet period avoids disruption charges and access problems. And a programme with a stated annual cost can be defended at budget time, whereas a series of unpredictable invoices looks like poor control even when each one was justified.
